Log onto Squarespace
Archives
Friday
29Jan2010

Food, Inc. (& more)

There’s always a high, a passion, when I, as a fat woman, find a diet book that makes me go, “Ah HA! That’s what’s been missing! I have The Key now. I am on my way to health and smaller-ness!” 

So, when I watched as people in Facebook viewed “Food, Inc.” and said things like, “I’ll never eat fast food again!” or “I’m boycotting anything Monsanto makes,” I, behind my computer screen, rolled my eyes and though, “Whatever.” 

Oprah, a couple of days ago, had a show called Food 101 that talked about Food, Inc., showing scenes and talking to Michael Pollan about his new book, “Food Rules.” I was riveted from the first moment. Also on the show was the chef who created Chipotle, Steve Ells. Chipotle is an extremely conscientious fast food restaurant that uses as many local and sustainable foods as possible. Chipotle’s success proves that fast can also mean quality. 

I saved the Oprah to show Sarah (who patiently watches anything I DVR for her to see) and before it was over, she said, “We’re watching that movie tonight.” It was already 11:00pm! 

So, I found the movie On Demand, paid the $4.99 to see it, and we settled in, not realizing we were about to change our lives. 

My mouth hung open throughout the whole movie. How could I not know these things? How could I not know that 80% of the hamburger I eat is washed in ammonia? How could I not know that only four companies owned our meat supply? How could I not know the bullies Monsanto has become, especially when it comes to the soybeans in our country (and others’)?

Monsanto, to me, was the sponsor of the 1970’s Disney World movie-in-the-round experience, Circle Vision 360. The pre-ride slide show imbedded Monsanto’s innovative ideas into our minds and demonstrated the extreme importance of making life easier around the world. Who knew they’d grow to be so monstrous as to sue a lowly soy farmer because their patented soy dust contaminated the farmer’s crops and he unwittingly had “Monsanto soybeans” growing in his dirt. How ridiculous can you get? Pretty ridiculous, apparently. 

I had no idea that our government agencies that oversee food production in our country were headed by former employees of those production companies. How could I not know this? Did I really have my head that far in the sand? 

Food, Inc. unveiled several different stories that they told better than I. Please, please see it if you haven’t already. 

Also because of Oprah’s show, I got hungry for Michael Pollan’s books, so went to Barnes & Noble (which I haven’t done in over a year) and picked up the Food Rules and also the Omnivore’s Dilemma. I zipped through Food Rules (it’s very short, but very powerful!) and am now beginning the other. 

I had to go to Costco yesterday; I usually pick up some chicken, burgers or other quickie meal, but needed to buy beer for Sarah’s poker game (or I wouldn’t have been there). 

When I walked in, it was as if I was seeing/hearing what was really in there for the first time. I could feel the very few companies snickering at all the “choices” they have offered us. I was overwhelmed by the amount of soy and corn everything had – and that still sits in my cupboard at home. I randomly grabbed an item and read the contents. 15 ingredients, several of which I needed to sound out? Probably not a good choice. Look at Velveeta, Cheetos, Ghirardelli Brownie mix… and we don’t even need to question the reality that Lucky Charms isn’t… what the heck have I eaten all these years? Where are all the freaky chemicals residing in my body? I considered buying some flour in bulk, but when I saw the “ConAgra” on every bag, I made a face at it and walked on. 

It’s probably too late to fix anything inside/under my skin, but snatching money and power back from the corporate giants is enough of a reason to change my eating style. 

After Costco, I went to Henry’s, a smaller Whole Foods here in San Diego. There, the giant shouting was much less. I heard whispers coming from the produce area, soft, but louder voices in the dairy aisle. Poking around, I still found the demon lurking behind packages and plastic covers. You’d think I wouldn’t be able to find any items with High Fructose Corn Syrup, but there were plenty. You’d think I wouldn’t find foods with 12 ingredients, including polysyllabic chemicals keeping them “fresh” for weeks at a time, but I did. So, while I was able to find a half gallon of raw milk that came from a grass fed, free-range, sustainable farm (for $6.50 I might add), the “good” foods were still few and far between.

This weekend, I will find a Farmer’s Market and see what that’s all about.

I realize I have the luxury of only buying food for two, that my midwifery schedule allows me great amounts of time to bake bread, cook wild rice and piece together elaborate recipes; but I haven’t done that. At all. I cook as if Sarah and I work 70 hour work weeks, lazily allowing these giant companies to lull me into a stupor of inactivity.

I used to cook. When I tried to tell Meghann I don’t know how to cook, that I will have to learn, she said, “Mom, you’re lying! You used to cook all the time.” And I thought, “Hey, I did, too, didn’t I.” I used to make all the bread for my family and several others, kneading it and everything. I used to make macaroni and cheese from scratch, brownies from scratch, lovely vegetarian dishes and delicious (nutritious!) snacks for the kids and adults in the family. Where did that end? Why is it so far away I even forgot I could cook!?

At Henry’s, I bought some organic baby lettuces (albeit, in a plastic box) and some organic carrots. For dinner, I made Sarah and I salads with those carrots, added tangerines, apples, a little bit of a steak we had leftover and topped it with organic salad dressing I also grabbed. We loved it. And didn’t feel like we were lumps of flesh that needed to sleep for an hour.

So, in preparation for our move, I gave away almost all of my natural foods cookbooks, ones I’d used for 20+ years. I moaned about that this morning and Sarah looked at me without pity and said, “You have the Internet. You didn’t have that 20 years ago. You will be fine without the cookbooks.” And she is right. Was I looking for another excuse to not prepare meals in a simpler manner? (Probable.) Was I looking to buy more books? (Probable.)

But, I have you all. I can grab tons of recipes from my readers, old favorites that require real ingredients, ones that don’t come with giant nametags on them.

This kind of eating doesn’t come with a specific weight loss as a goal. There is no measuring the waist-hip ratio to see if health is improving. There will be the lowering of the Glucophage, the increase in mobility, the lessening of the weight and inflammation on my joints, the brightening of my moods, the minimizing of my over-sleeping and the increase in my focus to work and write.

And all I have to do is what La Leche League has said for 30 years: Eat as close to the earth as possible. What’s taken me so long?

Friday
22Jan2010

My Media Release

So, I've been remiss for far too long in not employing a Media Release so I am able to use the photos and information from my clients and others whose births I attend. Up until now, it has been verbal, but in this day and age of the Internet and immediate information transfer, I know I can no longer go by word alone.

I drew this up today from another older one I had. I would love comments and if you see something missing, please let me know... I can add as needed.

If you are one of my clients, by the end of the weekend, you will find this contract in your emailbox.

I'm comfortable with others using this either as a template for their own or even word-for-word. I'm all for protecting oneself - and our clients.

I hereby give my permission for Barbara E. Herrera, LM, CPM to: (please circle acceptable choices) 

______ Take photos of my pregnancy, birth and postpartum period. 

______ Photos may/may not show nudity – breasts – the actual birth with vulva pictures. 

______ May/May not use my name when using my photos or speaking/writing about my pregnancy, birth, postpartum, breastfeeding or family experience. (She has explained she typically does not use names.) 

______ May/May not use the photos on the following social networking sites: www.NavelgazingMidwife.com (Midwifery website), www.NavelgazingMidwife.squarespace.com (Blog), Facebook, www.YouTube.com, etc. If new technology is created, she will ask specific requests regarding using the photos there. 

______ May/May not submit photos of me, my baby or my family to magazines and media. No photo of the baby will include genitals (inclusive of entire Media Release). I will receive no compensation if the photos are published, but Barb will give our family a copy of the periodical in which the photo appears. Magazines might be hard copy or on the Internet. 

______ May/May not use photos of me, my birth, my baby or my family during conference presentations, midwifery texts and books. 

______ If any opportunity to use the photos arise that are not covered here, Barb will ask specific permission and add it to this Release. 

______ To speak about/Not speak about my pregnancy, labor, birth, postpartum, breastfeeding, parenting on any social networking site, periodical, public speaking engagements, book or midwifery text. If future technology is created, she agrees to ask additional permission to include it. She agrees to use professional discretion and we understand her primary reason for sharing is educational and not voyeuristic. She agrees, if I ask, to disclose where she has discussed me, my pregnancy, labor, birth, postpartum, breastfeeding, parenting and marital situations. 

______ To write about/Not write about my pregnancy, labor, birth, postpartum, breastfeeding, parenting on any social networking site, periodical, public speaking engagements, book or midwifery text. If future technology is created, she agrees to ask additional permission to include it. She agrees to use professional discretion and we understand her primary reason for sharing is educational and not voyeuristic. She agrees, if I ask, to disclose where she has discussed me, my pregnancy, labor, birth, postpartum, breastfeeding, parenting and marital situations. 

While I may make changes in the future to this Media Release, the changes will not be retroactive, but will be from the date of changes forward. 

Barb agrees not to charge me or my family for the photos she takes if I agree to allowing them to be shared. If I do not want her to share any birth or postpartum photos, but still would like her to take pictures, I agree to pay $500 for a birth and $300 for a postpartum session.

Barb agrees to make available all photos she keeps after deleting the blurry or mis-taken pictures.

Barb will keep a copy of this Release in my midwifery chart or, if I am not a midwifery client, in a separate chart specifically for Releases. She will scan the Release and email me the copy. 

I have considered these options and have discussed them with my partner/another important person in my life and understand the importance of full informed consent – and give it here. 

_____________________________________        ________

Mother’s Signature                                                    Date 

_____________________________________        ________

Partner’s Signature                                                    Date       

_____________________________________        ________

Barbara E. Herrera, LM, CPM                                      Date

Wednesday
20Jan2010

Labor: A Visual Guide

(Meant for student midwives, apprentices and doulas.) 

… from my experiences over the last 27 years, including discussions with others; ymmv. 

Sitting with my mama the other day, watching her wander around, leaning over every few minutes, I knew, even without a vaginal exam, that she wasn’t past 3 centimeters dilated. She’d been contracting since the night before and had been passing bloody mucous, but her demeanor, her movements and even her scent were not of a woman in active labor. 

Definitions: 

-          Labor – When regular contractions dilate the cervix somewhat continuously… typically after 3-4 centimeters; anything before would be considered early labor as opposed to active. I am not wont to use the phrase “false labor,” because, to me, any contraction serves a purpose, even if it is merely to draw the mother’s attention to her baby.

-          Gloppies – a term I use to describe bloody show or even extra mucous. I use it tenderly and women immediately know what I mean when I ask, “Do you have gloppies?” Gloppies can begin well before labor, but ramp up considerably as labor progresses. Big globs of mucous and blood are typical at about 6-8 cms. If you see this and you aren’t doing exams, this would be a great time to consider moving into the hospital if you are a doula or preparing for a birth if you are in the home setting. I am aware that some people think the term is juvenile at best and gross at the worst. You are free to use your own terms. 

Women in early labor can be somewhat chatty. They are in the here and now plane as opposed to the other-worldly plane of active and advanced labor. Some women are rooted in the here and now for a long time, well into what dilation would consider “transition,” but most women fall into their hypnotic, spacey place around 6 centimeters; some sooner, but that is pretty rare. They might be quiet and introspective, but not in that high place. 

(Mom at 7 centimeters.) 

(The same mom at 9 centimeters.)  

Some women can mimic heavy labor, yet be in the early phase. I was one of those… dramatic, needing attention; whining. A woman in good, active labor has a contraction like this: Walking, walking, slowing down, slowing, stopping, leaning, leaning and swaying, beginning to moan, moan and sway, moan and sway… throughout the contraction. As the contraction wanes, the woman stays hunched over, holding on, allowing the last quakes to recede before taking a deep breath and moving very slowly to a stand, then slowly moving again… the movement picking up as the contraction is totally gone. Whereas a more  dramatic woman (and there is certainly nothing wrong with a woman who tends towards drama) stops and starts suddenly… like this: walking, walking, walking upright... either sits, leans sideways on a wall when the contraction comes… her vocal tone is even different, being more breathy than deep. And once the contraction is over, she bops right back up and into the activity she was doing or the conversation she was having.  

A nurse told me about a woman who presented at the hospital in “serious” labor; she was 2cm. They sent her home and she came back in hard labor twelve hours later; she was still 2cm and got an epidural soon after. That’s dramatic and wanting help/attention for lack of support, playing out childhood issues or habit. Trying to fix it (whatever "it" is) in the moment can be frustrating (and unfair if resolving deep issues isn’t your specialty), so attending to the woman where she is is usually easier for you and the mom. 

In my experience, dramatic women tend to whine. “It huuurrrrts.” “Make it stop.” “I hate this.” This isn’t the “I can’t do this anymore” of transition (and we’ll get back to this in a few), but a whiny, negative attitude right from the beginning. It would seem counter-intuitive that this type of woman would choose a homebirth where anesthesia isn’t an option, but she gets a different type of attention from a midwife; more motherly than what she perceives the hospital to be… punitive. The psychology of birth is absolutely fascinating and I hope someone explores the dynamics, the relationships, the motivations and resolutions someday. 

Whiny women take longer to get into the labor high, being so in their heads, it can be a challenge for them to let go enough to be swept up into labor’s current. When she does, amazingly, she stops whining, but usually becomes very introspective and often moans very softly, whereas other women might be loud vocalizers. 

I picture dramatic women as stomping around loudly, boots making all kinds of ruckus. It takes purpose to lift the legs up and clomp them down, but it’s worth it to have someone pay attention to her. Movements are sweeping, large and abrupt. As labor moves her deeper, she takes the boots off and slides softly across the floor, her movements closer to her body, her voice singing mostly to herself. (I hope this makes some sort of sense.) 

Another type of women who struggles to get out of her head is the academic. She will read every pregnancy and birth book she can find, sure she will be able to “out-think” this labor thing. If she just knows how to breathe/move/visualize, she will conquer the birth experience. In fact, these types of women have a hard time letting go of the (supposed) recipe the books talked about, confused when labor doesn’t follow the pattern she was led to believe it would be. Fumbling along, lurches and stops, I’ve seen these women with furrowed brows and shoulders up, as if they’re shrugging… trying to figure out where they’re going wrong. 

When you see a woman like this during pregnancy, it’s so important to let her know how labor isn’t a head experience, but a body one, that the head is better left aside. I really encourage these types of moms to stop reading everything after 37 weeks; that seems to help. 

It takes reminding in early labor, but usually around 4-5cm, they “get” the mind-body dis-connection and fall into the rhythm of labor. 

Women who exercise a lot frequently have similar issues even though it would seem they can tolerate more pain and are in touch with their bodies more. However, they know their bodies in exercise, not in labor, which is a different type of runner’s high. Of all the labor-challenged women, I find these women find their place in the contractions quicker than anyone else. Once they have surrendered their bodies, they can tolerate labor easier than others, although I have known plenty of extreme sports’ women to have epidurals. Athletes include any of the sports you might find at the Olympics, but also ballerinas, cheerleaders, dancers and the like. 

Some women have problems physically dilating. These women include those who’ve had procedures on their cervix… cone biopsy or laser surgery, for example… women working through sexual or physical abuse issues (whether they are aware of them or not) and women who are very modest. They are like the dramatic women who act like they are much further along in labor or, more commonly, have terrible, if not excruciating, pain, even in early labor. The hope, of course, is that the body takes over, leaving the mind (even if it is subconscious) behind to fend for itself. Even the scarred cervix can often open without intervention if contractions are long and strong enough. (As a midwife, I have “snapped” scar tissue on cervices before. VERY painful, but can dilate the cervix several centimeters once they are broken.) When these women are able to scale the hurdle, whatever it is, they quickly find themselves where other women would be without those impediments.

On the same subject, helping a woman feel safe or a modest woman remain covered, these kindnesses help women to be able to fall into their labors, allowing them the freedom to open and prepare for birth.  It isn’t fair to tell a mother, “It’s just us girls, so don’t worry about that,” or “You don’t have anything I haven’t seen before,” because she is not the midwife/doula, she is the laboring woman, baring her very spirit in front of relative strangers; the least we can do is provide her the privacy she requests.  Not every woman tells you she’s modest, but even if you don’t see it in pregnancy, she might try to keep herself covered, a blanket around her or shutting the bathroom door from even her spouse. It’s our responsibility to read our clients; their actions are just as loud as their voices… and often, more so. 

There are fewer of the above types of women than there are run-of-the-mill women (not that every woman isn’t unique of course), so it can be pretty easy to pick them out of the group. 

For most women, the more typical pattern resembles the one mentioned at the beginning of the piece, from able-to-communicate (3-5 or so cm.) to high and floaty (5-10cm). 

Scent is another way to tell where a woman is in labor. I thought everyone could smell a woman in active labor, but apparently that isn’t the case. Pay attention and see if you are one of those that can. When I smell that special scent, I know, for sure, she is in active labor and progressing. What’s interesting is women who are not progressing do not have the scent (for me). I have a heightened sense that something isn’t right and investigate further what it might be. Now, I’ve not smelled the scent and women have birthed perfectly fine, so I don’t really know why some women have it and some women don’t. 

Thinking about it (and it isn’t a thinking thought, but a sensory thought), it isn’t a scent on the woman, but a scent that comes from a woman. I’ve tried to figure out where it comes from, but have determined it isn’t directly from the vagina. I mean, it isn’t the heavy, musky, oozie scent you get when you are between her legs or changing a Chux pad and, as far as I can tell, it isn’t the smell of ketones on a woman’s breath, that sweet smell that comes from not having eaten for hours on end. It seems to come more from her breasts, her chest area. It’s a “deep” scent… not musky, necessarily, but primal and vaguely familiar (and not just from having smelled it before). 

Why would women have a scent in deep labor? Would it be an ancient clue to get the woman to a safe place? Get her into “the red tent”? Is it a sign to step back and let the woman fall deeply into herself so she might be one with the baby as they work to bring him into the world? 

The scent can be fleeting, a whiff gotten and then it vanishes, but the woman labors on and births triumphantly. 

There was one time when “birth” walked into the room. When Beth was in labor, right before she delivered, The Scent came from beyond and came to her instead of from her; it was almost tangible. When I smelled it/felt it, the assistants and I went to wash our hands quickly and, as we came back, the baby began to be born. I was high from that ethereal moment for weeks! 

So, now we have a mom in heavy labor. How can you tell where a she is? 

Remembering that everything is merely a guideline, I find women get deeper and deeper into themselves the further they move towards delivery. When women are unable to communicate anymore… unable to answer even simple questions, they are moving beautifully towards meeting their baby. We are so used to offering choices to each other, family members and even doulas will ask, “Do you want some water? Juice?” “Do you need to go to the bathroom?” Instead, offer a sip or take mom for a walk. When we ask a question, it pulls mom back to the real world when she should be permitted to stay inside her bubble of labor energy.

So, your mom is now in that incommunicative place and then she begins talking again, telling you she can’t do this anymore, that she’s so, so tired, she just wants to sleep. 

This is the time to throw a party! (Not literally.) She is on the cusp of pushing when she says these statements. Women do not need to be taken to the hospital or given an epidural during this time, they need to be supported, encouraged that they are almost finished. I find that telling them they will be able to sleep once the baby’s born, his body cradled against hers, helps women keep going. 

When we watched Lynsee give birth live on the Internet back in November 2009, many natural birth supporters, myself included, were terribly dismayed when she got to that point, reaching out and asking for help, telling her providers she just couldn’t do it anymore. Instead of looking her in the eye, staying with her while she rode the wild waves, touching her, letting her squeeze their hands… instead of this type of non-interventive, but extremely important support, Lynsee was whisked out of the tub she was in and nearly thrown onto the bed in the fetal position so the anesthesiologist could get at her spine. Before we could even type, “STOP! You’re doing great!” to her, she was numbed from the waist down, at 8 centimeters, and her dreamy hormones abated, she then able to chat and laugh as if she wasn’t even in labor anymore. 

I wish I could show pregnant women the difference, how Lynsee was moaning beautifully, somewhat scared, but reassured with tender words and hand-holding versus her demeanor after the epidural. All ethereal qualities vanish with an epidural. 

As women come through the last of her uterus’ dilation, after she believes you that she can do it and doesn’t moan, “I can’t” anymore, watch… many women’s contractions start to spread out (not slow down as some would describe it), she being able to rest more inbetween contractions. (Not all women have this happen! Don’t teach/counsel women that this will occur; it very well may not.) I have often heard women snoring softly at this point. Do NOT, under any circumstances, tell a woman she is snoring and try to keep anyone else from saying it. Women can be humiliated knowing they snore. And, most women would argue with you that she did not even go to sleep, so how could she possibly be snoring? 

Watch for this subtle spreading out of contractions and listen carefully as mom begins the slight Nnnnn of the beginnings of pushing. It really takes a learned ear to catch the earliest nudgings, but it gets easier with time. It is not hard to notice when she begins the familiar “catch” at the height of the contraction. By that time, she has been moving from first to second stage… not a solid shift, but a more fluid evolution from pregnant to birthing. 

When women have vaginal exams, this can be a time when she’s 9 to 9+ centimeters dilated. Sometimes there is moulding of the baby’s head, part of the skull crossing over itself and pushing downward before she is dilated completely. So if she isn’t pushing full of gusto, she, most likely isn’t complete. 

There was a recent discussion about cervical lips. This is my take on them. I believe (and have never read proof) that the cervix does not dilate in a spherical fashion, but more on a rolling opening, the left side being 7, the right being 7+… the top being 5, the bottom being 4. I believe this because, when a mom is moving around, the head and the pelvis are in a state of flux, adjusting each other and themselves so the head can get into a great position to birth. Especially when a mom is in bed, we see the cervix dilating at odds with itself, often having to turn her from side to side to get each side even with the other. 

I believe that a cervical lip is merely the last stage of a woman dilating unevenly (but correctly) and if we didn’t have our fingers in there, we would never know there was a lip. 

Now, I’ve felt my share of cervical lips, so don’t get me wrong that I think all lips would be avoided with no exams, but I feel they are over-“diagnosed” and we’d be better letting the woman work through the end of her labor on her own. 

So, when she’s doing the small Nnnnn’s, I believe she’s dilating that last little bit, some of the head already without cervix and nudging downward while the other side still working to eliminate the rest of it. Once she is complete, the pushing tends to begin in earnest. 

When we don’t do vaginal exams on second and subsequent birthing women, especially when they’ve previously birthed in the hospital, the question invariable comes up: “How will I know when I’m 10 centimeters?” My answer is: “You’ll know.” Women rarely miss the pushing phase.

(Pushing & the Birth of the Placenta next.)

Sunday
17Jan2010

Pitting Edema

Here, a mom has what is called "pitting edema."

The pressure mark on the upper right of the photo is what I'm referring to.

Edema is measured by pressing the thumb into the flesh and seeing how long the indentation remains as well as how deep it goes. Reading around the Net, you would wonder why some grade it one way and other sites a different way. This is how I learned.

1+ Slight pitting, no visible change in the shape of the extremity, depth of indentation 0-1/4" (<6 mm); disappears rapidly
2+ No marked change in the shape of the extremity; depth of indentation 1/4-1/2" (6-12 mm); disappears in10-15 seconds
3+ Noticeably deep pitting, swollen extremity, depth of pitting 1/2-1" (1 -2.5 cm); duration 1-2 minutes
4+ Very swollen and distorted extremity, depth of pitting > 1" (>2.5 cm); duration 2-5 minutes

The edema in the picture was a +3, disappearing right at a minute and a few seconds.

Edema in pregnancy is pretty normal, but the more swelling there is, not only does the woman get more uncomfortable, but, depending on how extensive the edema is, it can herald some possible complications, including Pregnancy Induced Hypertension, Preeclampsia or HELLP Syndrome. This is not meant to be a treatise on edema, but merely to show what it looks like.

I will mention, however, that many midwives prescribe baths full of water with the addition of Epsom Salt. The medical name for Epsom Salt is Magnesium Sulphate, the medicine used during labor when a woman has blood pressure issues. Given through an IV, the medication helps keep seizures at bay. In the bath, however, it helps the body find balance by removing as much excessive swelling as possible; what remains is a clear clinical picture of what is happening.

We could discuss the complications for days, but I'm going to leave that for another few posts. Besides, Googling, one can find infinite amounts of information about any of the above terms.

I'm glad I could get this picture; it's not often I have a client with this much edema.

 

 

Saturday
16Jan2010

A Visual Tour of an Non-Stress Test

While there are many sites that explain what a non-stress test (NST) is, it isn’t often we get to see what they look like.

Here, I will describe what we are seeing, playing tour guide around a strapped belly that kindly allows us a vantage point.

There are two colors of the elastic straps; the color is inconsequential, a random choice as to which monitor it goes on. As you can see, the colors, pink and blue, are deliciously sexist. 

The pink strap here is holding the fetal heart monitor on the mom’s belly. The elastic has slits in it so the band can be adjusted, tightly, around mom’s stomach, holding the monitor in place. Women need to sit still with the monitor on lest it wiggle out of listening zone on the baby’s upper back (where the heartbeat is heard clearest). Laughing, turning from one side to the other, lying back or sitting up more can all require a re-adjustment of both monitors. You can see why, in the middle of labor, it would be easier to have a mom monitored with an epidural; women without one move all over the place, requiring the nurse to adjust and re-adjust it over and over again. 

The monitor on the mom listens and the bedside machine (also called the monitor) clomps out the sound of the baby’s heartbeat as well as blinks the heart rate to one side of the machine. When the monitor is “listening” accurately, it can sound like a horse galloping down the street. Clompity clomp, clompity clomp, clompity clomp… at a clip of 120 to 160 beats per minute. Looking at the bedside monitor strip (see picture below), the baby’s heartbeat is the top squiggly line. With education and experience, a nurse/doctor/midwife is able to look at the line and determine the baby’s well-being. A line that doesn’t change much is considered “flat” and not a positive sign, especially if it stays flat during a contraction, meaning the baby isn’t reacting to the increasing pressure. We’d want to see the baby have some reaction, hopefully the heart rate going up slightly. 

While listening can be helpful, it really is easier to look at the strip, comparing the contraction to the baby’s heart rate. There are nuances that can give information about how the baby is doing during labor. When we hear (which usually comes first) a beat that’s half that fast, the first thing to do is make sure the mother’s pulse isn’t being picked up, quickly adjusting the monitor and, at the same time, feeling for the mother’s pulse on her wrist, seeing if the beats match. If they do not and the heart rate does not recover with position changes or stopping contractions, mama’s (most likely) off to have a baby in the operating room – fast. 

Here is a fabulous site that discusses the variations of normal and abnormal when looking at fetal heart tracings in labor.

The monitor under the blue strap measures uterine contractions (UCs). The technical name for monitoring a contraction is tocodynameter (I was corrected. Sorry for the initial incorrect name.). You might hear the nurse say, “Toco” and she’s talking about the transducer and its need to to be adjusted or some other reference to the monitor. 

This monitor is placed on the fundus, the top of the uterus. A nipple-like button rests between the round monitor and the mom’s skin. As a contraction comes, the button gets squeezed and measured on the bedside monitor just like the fetal heart beat one, but on its own line (the bottom line in the picture).

I turned the picture on its side so you can see the two lines. See the bottom one with the mountain? That mountain is a contraction. This mom was not on pitocin. 

Just like the fetal monitor, if mom wiggles or shifts positions, the monitor can slide down and not register any contractions if mom is having any. Or, if mom shifts in a way that the monitor is tighter, it can look, to the lay person, that the mom is having some helacious contractions when, in fact, the baseline has moved way up. Put another way, while the fetal monitor blinks out the actual heart rate of the baby (actually, it’s about 1-2 seconds behind the beats), the UC monitor “rates” the level of contractions, from 0 to about 100. If the monitor is placed correctly, the machine is “zero’d out” and the monitor's numbers dive down to the steady 20 of no contraction. As the contraction builds, the number climbs, usually slowly, over the course of about 45 seconds or so and then starts its descent, ending again at 20. Women having mild contractions might register about 45 or so whereas I have seen pitocin’d women go so high the monitor doesn’t register it and the paper has a flat line across the top until a contraction goes down again and is able to be seen on the paper.

A comment from Cindy says it in a more technical manner:

"The appearance of the contractions on the tracing is based on maternal habititus, placement of the monitor, fetal position, and lastly ctx strength. When the belt is moved, it is completely random where the ctx. tracing now prints. WIth an Intra-Uterine Pressure Catheter (IUPC) the ctx. tracing would show resting tone and strength."

If the monitor is properly placed and calibrated, going that high would, in my experience, prompt the nurse to cut the pitocin off so mom’s uterus doesn’t explode or the baby doesn’t suffocate from the intensity of the squeezing of the uterus. 

Look again at the picture above. Look on the left page and see how the bottom line is very close to the bottom of the paper? That’s pretty zero’d out. Then, after the contraction, see how much higher the line is? Mom must have moved and shifted the “zero” on the monitor. So, if she had another contraction with that higher baseline, it can look like she’s having a much bigger contraction when it really was about the same as the one before. If people don’t know about the zero-ing the machine out, they could think, erroneously, that the contraction is “a huge one!” when, in fact, the gauge began at 70 and the UC was quite mild. 

Hey, here’s an idea for the family and support people. Instead of watching the monitor for all these numbers, how about we watch and be with the mother! She will tell you, accurately (if she doesn’t have an epidural, of course), what the contraction is doing. She can feel it going up, topping out and then going down. Isn’t that amazing?! I always think contractions are so incredible… that our bodies have the wherewithal to propel a baby out of the host body. It boggles the mind sometimes. 

Now, look at the top picture again. See the thingie the mom is holding with a button on the end? This is a marker for mom to press when the baby moves. This puts a hash mark on the bedside monitor’s paper so the person reading the strip can see how the baby does with fetal movement. Little tiny arrows point, next to the upper/fetal heart rate line to make it easier to read. Experienced nurses sometimes forego the button pushing because, with practice, it is possible to see the baby’s movements with the heart rate shiftings. 

So, there’s your tour of the image of a Non-Stress Test. This, of course, doesn’t speak to the need of an NST or how to prepare for one, but this is a start. Hope you enjoyed yourself!

 

 

Tuesday
12Jan2010

Observing Fetal Position (without one's hands)

In this picture, you can see the RN doing an ultrasound scan. The gel on mom's belly helps the soundwaves connect to the sounds inside the uterus. While it is possible to see the pictures or hear the baby's heartbeat without gel, we get a much less clear image and a pretty spotty sound. The gel helps conduct the information from doppler/transducer to sound/image.

What we are looking at, however, is the shape of this woman's 38 week belly. See the elevated part on the our left/her right? Right above where the blob-line of gel is? That is the baby's bottom under there.

The transducer in the nurse's hand is almost directly on top of the baby's head. Follow the baby's body around our left, curving around, "seeing" the back, somewhat turned sideways, directly under and then rolling over the line of gel. The highest point is the baby's butt, pooching out is part of the back of the bottom and part of the hip. All baby's wiggle around, sticking out their body parts, but it was great to catch the baby stretching somewhat, showing us her booty.

So, "look" where the raised area drops down quickly. That would be where the legs begin to be tucked under the body. If you need to use a doll to demonstrate the position, it can really help with visualizing the baby inside the uterus. Remember, the baby is in a ball, usually with legs crossed and arms closed or near the face... the closer to birth, the tighter in there.

If I was being shown this photo, I might say this is merely an optical illusion, but I checked by looking head-on and yes, the butt is poking out.

The position of this baby is Right Occiput Transverse.

Friday
01Jan2010

Amnion & Chorion

Below is a great picture that shows the amazing nature of the amniotic sac. Take a look and I'll explain afterwards.

The amniotic sac is made of two individual membranes connected by friction; the amnion and the chorion. In this picture, you can't tell which is which, but you can see that one of the two has slid down, some air even getting between the two, making that bubble.

Each membrane has a function. The amnion is closest to the baby and is responsible for making the amniotic fluid (easy to remember that the amniotic fluid is around the baby, so the amnion is next to the baby). The chorion, among other things, helps change the mom's nutrition into a form the baby can absorb via his blood. When there is chorionic villi sampling early in pregnancy, it is the chorion they are taking the sample from.

While I knew hospitals "donated" (sold) placentas to a variety of places from cosmetic companies to (rumored) dog food makers, I hadn't ever considered the medical use of this amazing part of the birthing process. Until Sarah got ocular lymphoma - eye cancer.

Quick aside is that when they removed the cancer, they had to use something to cover the open wound in her eye. The membrane was also going to act as scaffolding so the eye cells could grow across and meet each other, the 40 very tiny sutures falling out, thereby losing the membrane. The whole piece removed was smaller than the eraser on a pencil. When we were sitting with the surgeons, they were talking around us, thinking we didn't know what they were saying - even though I'd told them more than once I was a midwife. "Blah blah blah... a graft will go over the wound... blah blah blah." Our ears perked up and asked what the graft was going to be made of. Monotone, they said it would be one of two things, either the foreskin of a newborn's penis.... WHAT?!? We were horrified. Although... Sarah had to make a joke about it saying she couldn't possibly use the foreskin, then she'd be cock-eyed. We laughed our heads off. They were stone-faced. She then said she wouldn't allow the foreskin to be put in her eye... what was the other choice.

Amnion. I perked up and said, "Amnion? Like amnion and chorion?" And they said yes, that they only use the amnion (not sure why they only use that side). Joking, I told them I could bring in many samples, we could try and match the best one to the color of her eyes. They didn't think it was funny and droned on about pathology and sterility, blah blah. We thought it was funny.

The day of surgery, we gave thanks to the mother and baby for their gift of the amnion that would protect Sarah's eye from the surgery insult.

I am always amazed by the amniotic membranes.

Friday
01Jan2010

Trailing Membranes

These next two pictures show "trailing membranes." When the placenta is born, but some of the amniotic sac is left inside, this is called trailing membranes. The membranes can be very delicate (even though they are wicked tough when the baby is inside them!), so need to be "teased" out. Midwives have a variety of methods and each midwife finds her own style with making sure trailing membranes come out intact.

Some will use a forcep, clamp it to the membranes and then, gently, gently, slide the membranes back and forth (or up and down), inching them out slowly. Going fast can break them, so this is delicate work. Other midwives use gauze to hold the membranes as they tease them out, feeling they can "feel" them coming out more easily than with an instrument. It definitely helps to use something because they are so slippery, it would be easy to wrap them around your finger/s and not know the tension you're using to get them out.

I was reminded by doctorjen that a common (great) way to tease the membranes out is to twist them. Using a ring forceps, twirl it slowly to "pull" it out.

 

This is an example of how long the trailing membranes can be.

Why is it important to get the membranes out? Leaving even a small piece inside can keep the uterus from contracting fully, which can cause a postpartum hemorrhage... or infection. I doula'd for a mom who developed a fever of 104 within 24 hours of her homebirth. In the hospital, they started antibiotics as well as making sure her uterus was firm and contracted. The reason for her sepsis was still unknown, so, after another 24 hours on antibiotics still with a high fever, the doctor decided to do a D&C to make sure all the placenta was removed. When they returned from surgery, the doctor said he didn't find anything, but sent the what he removed to pathology. Within a few hours, the path lab said they found a piece of amniotic sac the size of a newborn's clipped fingernail. I remain amazed. Does a woman always need to have a D&C if a small piece of membranes remains inside? Certainly not. Most women are able to get the fragment out on their own.

If a woman has trailing membranes and, as you are pulling them out, they break, in order to help a woman pass the fragment, having her take an herb or medication that contracts her uterus can keep her safe. While I am not as well-versed in herbs or homeopathics, the medication of choice would be methargine, taken 3-4 times a day for 2-3 days (depending on the midwife's judgement of need). Having your client take her temperature every 4 hours would be important as well. Her bleeding is yet another aspect that needs to be monitored. If she's bleeding an unusual amount, if it begins to smell foul, if she feels poorly, if she develops a fever (usually high), getting her medical help is warranted.

Friday
01Jan2010

Vernix

Notice the copious vernix on the baby. Whole globs of it on her face. Beautiful!

You can see how thick the vernix was by looking at the crease marks the wiping towel left on her cheek. Even with wiping the face, there is still plenty of vernix left! I have rarely seen this much vernix on a full-term baby. Just lovely.

Friday
01Jan2010

Baby Born in the Caul (Amniotic Sac)

These three photos are of a baby being born in the caul (in the amniotic sac). Pure luck had me in the right place at the right time with a camera in my hand.

This is close to birth. I have photos from right as the sac began presenting until the birth of the baby. While I've seen several babies born en caul, this was the "heaviest" I've seen to date.

It is hard to see if the amniotic sac was still on the face, but from what I remember, it was. As a midwife, I was trained to pull the sac off, using a sterile gauze so you can get a good hold of it, and pull from chin to brow. One midwife who was teaching me said she watched a baby inhale the sac as the student pulled it down from brow to chin. Even if that is an urban legend, it made sense to me and didn't seem harmful, so that's how I do it and teach it.

Most doctors have never seen a baby born in the caul; the amniotic sac is ruptured routinely in the hospital (Artificial Rupture of Membranes... AROM). I heard about a doctor who wanted to see if babies could be born in the sac and challenged fellow docs to try and accomplish this. He offered a $50 bounty for every baby born with the membranes intact. Suddenly, there were plenty of babies born without AROM! I'd love to see a doctor do the same bribing now.

There are plenty of midwives who also do AROM; I do not. I have ruptured membranes twice in the last 5 years, once because mom insisted and the other for a mama who was heading to the hospital for an induction and she was already about 5-6cm dilated. Again, it was her choice and, once I AROM'd, she delivered easily three hours later.

Some reasons for believing AROM is a good idea include allowing the head to put more pressure on the cervix, helping a baby to fall deeper into the pelvis (a variation on the pressure idea) and because it speeds up labor. There are numerous studies that show that AROM only hastens labor by a mere 30-60 minutes or so. To me, not worth the risk of infection or prolapsed cord (if the baby is high).

When a mom is GBS positive, it can be an even greater reason to not AROM. Once the membranes are ruptured, many start the time clock, wanting the mom to deliver (or be in active labor) by 18 hours post-rupture. The risk of GBS infection in the baby grows when 18+ hours of time have elapsed.

Definitely, informed consent and the risk/benefit ratio must be weighed when deciding to AROM.

Friday
01Jan2010

Splitting Up "Teaching" Posts

I was asked to split the "Teachable Moments" posts so each one stood on their own. I totally agree because women searching a certain term wouldn't be able to find what they were looking for so easily or quickly. This way, we can refer women to a specific topic without her having to read through the other information.

I will put the previous comments with their pictures, too.

Thursday
31Dec2009

The Placenta (& Amniotic Sac)

This is a lovely placenta, the maternal side... the side that is attached to the mother's uterus. The baby does not come in contact with this side. It's made up of cotyledons, veins, arteries and many more parts I am not familiar with; I haven't studied the placenta as much as midwifery.

The amniotic sac is rumpled around the edges.

Right at the bottom of the picture (5:00-6:00), the placenta has broken apart somewhat. The baby was born by cesarean, so I didn't see how the placenta was born, although the doctor delivering has a wonderful respect of the birth process and, I am sure, wouldn't have handled the placenta harshly. I still don't know why it broke apart in some areas. I did want to point out the lovely color, the deep purple/red coloration that demonstrates perfusion and health.

We can learn so much from a woman's placenta. It is more tangible than, say, the effects of a posterior labor. I believe the placenta is a powerful tool. My midwife friend Marla says the placenta tells tales on you; you cannot lie to the placenta.

This is the fetal side of a healthy placenta. Deep purple, lovely veins and arteries can easily be seen. When the placenta is in use, those vessels are plump and operating.

 

The baby lies against this side, tucked inside the amniotic sac; a soft pillow of a precious organ for the baby to live next to for about eight months (the placenta does not form immediately after conception). 

Talking about the placenta cannot be had without discussing the spiritual aspects of the organ. There are folks who feel the placenta, including the cord and the amniotic sac, belong to the baby. I've had numerous discussions about this, mainly because the mother is who creates these things and, to me, loans them to the baby. They begin in her, by her and remain with her until it has finished its job for the baby and then she releases it. Those who believe otherwise say they have research/proof that shows the baby is affected by what happens to the placenta and umbilical cord. that they wince, cry or show signs of an emotional disconnecting to the organ. It is this belief that leads some to choose to Lotus Birth, leaving the placenta attached to the baby via the cord until the umbilical cord falls off the baby. However you believe, I feel the placenta deserves a great deal of respect. It's an amazing organ... the only organ that is created, disposed of and a new one re-created when needed. Touching it lovingly demonstrates to the family your reverence for the mother's and baby's creative abilities.

Here is a placenta that is extremely unhealthy.

  

The mom who made this placenta had a very poor diet, fast food being the majority of her intake. The baby, over 11 pounds, demonstrated the mother's over-nourishment (she gained over 60 pounds).

Care providers who have seen this picture believe this was a Circumvallate Placenta, a variation (many believe not a normal one) whereas there is a double fold of amniotic sac forming a circle around the edges (simplistic explanation). Initially, I wondered if it wasn't a deposit of fat, but I think I was wrong in this thinking.

Healthy placentas allow free-flow of nutrients and oxygen. Said in extremely simplistic terms, when the placenta is compromised, parts of it die, leaving dead spots, whole places/sections that no longer provide health and well-being to the baby. I tell women we never know if what part has died, the part that goes to the fingernails - or the place that goes to the baby's brain. While not technically accurate, it brings home the point that what goes in - food, tobacco, marijuana - affects the baby directly.

I've seen similar placentas with teen moms who also didn't eat so well. Or with smokers or women who couldn't quit drugs during the pregnancy.

Some women have yucky placentas even though they ate meticulously and didn't smoke or do drugs. There are unknown reasons why placentas deteriorate and we might not know it until the placenta is born. However, placental insufficiency can also cause fetal growth restriction (used to be called fetal growth retardation, but that term was changed in the early 90's) or babies that are small for gestational age (SGA). We can suspect an SGA baby by monitoring a mother's fundal height throughout the pregnancy. Sometimes the fundal height doesn't grow and, less commonly, actually goes down (and it isn't because of a change in the baby's position, which needs to be ruled out), especially if it shows a trend of a lowering fundal height. The fundus is the top of the mother's uterus. We measure, in centimeters, from the top of the pubic bone to the fundus. After 12 weeks or so pregnant, the centimeters equal the weeks of a mother's pregnancy. Who discovered that? A great discovery, whoever it was.

One reason for serial measuring is the subjectivity of what the fundal height is. When women have different care providers at each visit, an SGA baby can go undetected for a couple three months. However, when there is one midwife measuring, the likelihood of missing a shrinking baby is much less since she should be measuring the same each time.

Women being told they have an SGA baby will be sent for an ultrasound, and often a couple more within the next month or two to keep tabs on the fetal growth. Again, an ultrasound can be a subjective measurement, but much less so than fundal height. Plus, if you have the same ultrasonographer each time, the results are more accurate.

Often, the amniotic sac, or membranes, are seen as separate when they are, quite intertwined physically. The sac is connected to the edges of the placenta and form a protective barrier between the baby and the mother's uterus. Amniotic fluid fills the space, allowing the baby to "swim" in a sterile ocean of saline water.

The amniotic sac is made of two individual membranes connected by friction; the amnion and the chorion. In this picture, you can't tell which is which, but you can see that one of the two has slid down, some air even getting between the two, making that bubble.

Each membrane has a function. The amnion is closest to the baby and is responsible for making the amniotic fluid (easy to remember that the amniotic fluid is around the baby, so the amnion is next to the baby). The chorion, among other things, helps change the mom's nutrition into a form the baby can absorb via his blood. When there is chorionic villi sampling early in pregnancy, it is the chorion they are taking the sample from.

While I knew hospitals "donated" (sold) placentas to a variety of places from cosmetic companies to (rumored) dog food makers, I hadn't ever considered the medical use of this amazing part of the birthing process. Until Sarah got ocular lymphoma - eye cancer.

Quick aside is that when they removed the cancer, they had to use something to cover the open wound in her eye. The membrane was also going to act as scaffolding so the eye cells could grow across and meet each other, the 40 very tiny sutures falling out, thereby losing the membrane. The whole piece removed was smaller than the eraser on a pencil. When we were sitting with the surgeons, they were talking around us, thinking we didn't know what they were saying - even though I'd told them more than once I was a midwife. "Blah blah blah... a graft will go over the wound... blah blah blah." Our ears perked up and asked what the graft was going to be made of. Monotone, they said it would be one of two things, either the foreskin of a newborn's penis.... WHAT?!? We were horrified. Although... Sarah had to make a joke about it saying she couldn't possibly use the foreskin, then she'd be cock-eyed. We laughed our heads off. They were stone-faced. She then said she wouldn't allow the foreskin to be put in her eye... what was the other choice.

Amnion. I perked up and said, "Amnion? Like amnion and chorion?" And they said yes, that they only use the amnion (not sure why they only use that side). Joking, I told them I could bring in many samples, we could try and match the best one to the color of her eyes. They didn't think it was funny and droned on about pathology and sterility, blah blah. We thought it was funny.

The day of surgery, we gave thanks to the mother and baby for their gift of the amnion that would protect Sarah's eye from the surgery insult.

I'll talk more about placental situations in another post.

Thursday
31Dec2009

Close-up View of Umbilical Vessels

Here is a close-up of the two arteries and one vein of the umbilical cord. The vein is the bleeding vessel.

Students often struggle to remember which has two, the arteries or veins. For some, repeating it over and over again (two arteries, one vein) is enough. I had to play a game in my head that said two is "better" than 1 and A is closer to the beginning than V; the best of both wins. I know, it sounds ridiculous, but however you can remember, please do. It's pretty important.

We always check to see if there are three vessels There are times when the umbilical cord has one artery and one vein (called a two-vessel cord or Single Umbilical Artery [SUA]). This can point to defects in the baby, but, often enough, doesn't tell us one thing measurable. I send babies to the Pediatrician within a couple of days of birth with the information about the two-vessel cord, but most times, it isn't an issue at all for the baby.

From Women's Health Information:

"Anywhere from half to two-thirds of babies born with single artery umbilical cord are born healthy and with no chromosomal or congenital abnormalities. Of the remaining babies with SUA, some studies suggest that about 25 percent have birth defects, including chromosomal and/or other abnormalities. These can include trisomy 13 or trisomy 18. However, the most common pregnancy complications that occur in infants with SUA are heart defects, gastrointestinal tract abnormalities and problems with the central nervous system. The respiratory system, urinary tract, and musculoskeletal system may also be affected. One in five babies affected by SUA will be born with multiple malformations." 

Thursday
31Dec2009

Effect of Shoulder Dystocia on Baby's Face

This photo is of a baby after a shoulder dystocia.

Notice the suffusion (the purple face compared to the normal-colored body), the bruising on the forehead, swollen eyes and the fat lips. The baby is also macrosomic (large-for-gestational age), usually because of insulin issues of some sort. You can almost feel how squishy the baby is from here. Macrosomic babies feel like dough in your hand, the fat squishes between your fingers when you are working on a shoulder dystocia or resuscitation. You can see this baby's moulded head, too.

Thursday
31Dec2009

Bruise from Vacuum Delivery

In this picture, you can see the results of a vacuum delivery on a baby's head. Notice the bruising and swelling on the moulded part of the skull.

The bruise disappeared before the first week was over.

Thursday
31Dec2009

Velamentous Insertion of the Umbilical Cord

Here is a photo of a velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord. This is when the vessels of the cord imbed into the chorion and run inbetween the amnion and chorion (the amniotic sac) for some length. Sometimes, the insertion is a couple of centimeters, but others, like this, are quite far.

When the vessels are at or near the opening of the cervix (Vasa Previa), they can burst when the membranes rupture and cause terrible damage or death to the baby. The baby "exsanguinates" - loses all his/her blood within a few minutes. One of my previous clients (x2) was pregnant with her fourth baby, had had three previous homebirths and was expecting to birth this one at home, too, but her membranes spontaneously ruptured and blood poured out. They called 911 and she was taken to the hospital where, a mere 15 or so minutes later, her baby had already died. She was induced and the baby boy was born vaginally. His family spent several hours with him, taking pictures of him and loving him lots before letting him go to be ready for burial. She went on the have two more babies with me at home... beautiful births, but her son was always in our minds.

In Facebook, someone wisely asked what would happen if there was cord traction on this type of placenta. This next picture shows what happens.

 The cord falls off.

We were taught Active Management of Third Stage, doing controlled cord traction to get the placenta out in a "timely manner." If there is a velamentous insertion, the cord is tenuously connected, so it doesn't take much to break it off.

With this woman's placenta, we had to go in and manually remove it.

When the cord has come off, I've only seen going in to get the placenta, but always wondered about just letting the placenta be born on its own. Is that possible? If we're going to not do cord traction, even if to get the placenta out of the vaginal vault, would the organ plop out on its own if the woman was upright?

Thursday
31Dec2009

Tongue-Tie

I recently went to help a mama who was having nursing issues. The baby was several weeks old and hadn't had a difficult time nursing earlier. Her instinct was the frenulum under the baby's tongue was getting in the way of his suck, so she asked me to come take a look.

After washing my hands, I felt under the baby's tongue and easily felt the frenulum and its tightness. In fact, when he stuck out his tongue, you could see the "fork" in his tongue, typical of a too-tight frenulum.

Many midwives cut the frenulums themselves and I have been taught how to do it, but this one was pretty deep and far back, so I sent her into the doctor to have it done. She looks forward to having her nursing experience hurt much less in the near future.

 

 

Thursday
31Dec2009

Birth Balls

Thursday
31Dec2009

Ugly (in L&D)

Thursday
31Dec2009

Mongolian Spot

A mongolian spot is a dark area typically on darker-skinned babies... Hispanic, African-American, Pacific Islanders, etc.

The first time I ever saw one, I wigged out, wondering how the heck a baby got so bruised inside the uterus. If I'd have seen the baby next day (without seeing him/her at birth), I would have thought s/he had been beaten the night before. The dark spot looks eerily like a big bruise.

Sometimes the mongolian spot is round and right at the base of the spine (as it was with my Hispanic children), but as you will see with this baby (half-African-American and half-Asian), the marks are more mottled and diffused.

The baby's anus is at the left edge of the picture, respectfully off the side. The white you see is vernix and someone pointed out the spots are so dark, you can see them through the vernix.

Some mongolian spots fade with time; many stay for a lifetime.