Log onto Squarespace
Archives

Entries in gay rights (3)

Saturday
Dec182010

Don't Ask, Don't Tell REPEALED!

It's such a momentous day... our family is celebrating as if it were New Year's Eve!

Remember that my spouse Sarah was in the US Army from 1983-1990 and was kicked out for being Lesbian despite garnering many awards and accolades for her superior work and work ethic. Sarah would have been an amazing career Army soldier; our country lost out immensely by the stupid rule... which, at that time was "Gay? Out you go. And take this Dishonorable Discharge with you." She negotiated an Honorable Discharge with a bar to re-enlistment.

The Army called Sarah when the first Gulf War broke out, telling her they needed her MOS (her specialty... a mechanic for diesel trucks 22.5 tons and bigger) critically for the war. She told them "If this dyke isn't good enough for you in peace time, she sure isn't good enough for you in war time. Go find some straight chick to carry those 50-pound tool boxes."

We are ecstatic. Absolutely giddy with joy!

Monday
Aug022010

Separatism: conflict amongst the ranks

We recently celebrated Pride here in San Diego, PrideFest, aka HomoFest. I went to the parade and stood with 150,000 others, cheering for our freedoms (and demanding even more), our hard-won self-esteem and for the sheer joy of hanging out with friends. When I marched with the kids in 1990, the parade was all of forty-five minutes long. This one went on for a couple of hours. 

Sarah and I had broken up for awhile in 1988. I was a crazed mess, so went into therapy and immersed myself into the lesbian community here in San Diego. I went to several lesbian support groups, but the one on Thursday nights turned out to be the most interesting of them all. 

Those weekly meetings at the (then) Gay & Lesbian Center, took me from the myopic, white, heterosexual, middle class mindset and introduced me to… nay, challenged me… to see from various vantage points and acknowledge that I was really just a self-centered, ego-driven, hypnotized woman who thought she knew what was going on in the world. I sat, spellbound, listening to women talk about oppressions I never knew existed. I grew up in the Deep South, so had an inkling of racial oppression, but sitting face to face with women of color was stunning. I endured finger pointing, enumerating the ways I, too, was oppressing women of color… saying things like “I don’t see color; I see people,” and not knowing the PC (politically correct) terms for the nuanced cultures of the women right around me. 

I learned about other marginalized cultures (“marginalized” was a word I heard many times in those days)… the bdsm (bondage/discipline/sadism/masochism) folks, the butch (more “masculine” energied) dykes, teens coming out, lesbian mothers (my people! …who were few and far between back then), migrant lesbians, etc. and the subcultures of each of the marginalized people. Those nights at Group opened my eyes to worlds I’d never imagined. It was there I realized that every topic, every person had their own subtext within them. And those subtexts were never-ending. None of that even begins to examine the “isms” of the day, including classism and sizeism (another group I embodied). 

It’s like this in birth, too, isn’t it? Under the umbrella of human procreation, there exist an infinite number of choices women can make (or are forced to endure). Depending on where you live and even the political atmosphere of the day, the choices are rounded up like a huge net grabbing fish in the ocean. Whoever does the throwing can alter the birth’s path and outcome. Birth in the hospital? At home? With a midwife? Alone? Or, if we live in a Third World Country, does the mother feel safer with her family or the local Traditional Birth Attendant (TBA)? Do we risk losing our safe hiding place to transfer to the hospital because of a hemorrhage? (And, please know, this is an area I do not have much information about… the different choices women have in other, less mechanized, cultures. I welcome the education.) 

And then we move down the flow chart, each choice above having an infinite number of options, or, if not options, an outcome that is different for every single woman… maybe not in the live baby/live mother, live baby/dead mother, dead baby/live mother or dead baby/dead mother, but each woman carries her own experience, some in the body, others in the heart and some even deep in their souls. 

At the Festival, I ran into a couple of women from those long-ago rap groups and the flood of memories prompted me to write this. The analogy was so striking, the things that are going on in birth; I just couldn’t ignore the beckoning sirens. I hope I don’t crash amongst the rocks. 

When Sarah (who was in the Army) and I were in Germany, we’d found an underground group of gay men and women (Friends of Dorothy) and one of those women called herself a Separatist. Not having the Internet, I learned through context what that meant. 

Kathy Belge describes Separatism like this: 

“Lesbian separatism is the feminist political act of choosing to be around only lesbians or only women. In the early years of the Feminist Movement, some lesbians chose to avoid interacting with men as a way to remove themselves from male-dominated society. Their belief was that even well-meaning men were sexist and influenced by the patriarchy. They chose to be around only women in order to understand what womanhood and sisterhood is really all about. Some women moved to the country, bought land and created women-only societies. Avoiding all men was impossible, but they chose to have all of their significant relationships with women. The idea was that women could never truly understand themselves as powerful beings if they were immersed in the dominant, sexist culture. From lesbian separatism the idea of women-only space came into being at concerts, conferences and festivals.” 

This particular woman we met in Germany was so much of a Separatist, she gave her son to his father because she couldn’t abide by having a penis in the house. 

Historically, it’s important to note the connection between the Black Separatist movements of the sixties, acting as models for the women who came after in the seventies. Other societies have also chosen to remove themselves from the mainstream, too; the Amish and the Shakers, for instance. 

Any of us who’ve been in the birth world for any length of time have watched the same happen. Doctor? Obstetrician? Doctor of Osteopathy? Family Practice MD? Registered Nurse? RN with or without a BSN? Certified Nurse Midwife? Certified Midwife? Licensed Midwife? Certified Professional Midwife? Unlicensed/Direct-Entry Midwife? Religious Midwife? Overseeing organizations are created, a board elected, rules written (and continuously debated); exclusivity is a hallmark of any patriarchally-oriented organization.

Again, under each of the above monikers, factions develop, pulling together and, at the same time, pulling apart, oftentimes creating a whole new category. 

In the late 1970’s, the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival was born. Note the spelling of “womyn” (alternately spelled “wimmin”) – any derivative of the word “men” in it was changed to a different, “womon”-centered word. (We find this same mindset in birth with the renaming of the vagina to yoni or contractions to surges.) While I didn’t come out until late 1986, the Music Festival, and many others like it were still going strong, this one in particular continuing today. 

 If you poke around, Googling MWMF, you’ll see an on-going discussion, years long, about whether to allow transgender folks to attend. Lisa Vogel, one of the founders of the yearly event says: 

“Since 1976, the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival has been created by and for womyn-born womyn, that is, womyn who were born as and have lived their entire life experience as womyn. Despite claims to the contrary by Camp Trans organizers, the Festival remains a rare and precious space intended for womyn-born womyn.” 

Interestingly, this wasn’t a concern back in the mid-late 80’s. Instead, then, it was the battle between allowing male children to attend or not. Some didn’t want any males there… no penises at all. Others were okay with nurslings and there were women who said kids under five. They picked five years old because they were still heavily influenced by their mothers, but after that they were in school and being influenced by the patriarchy. I see now, they’ve got two delineations: five and ten. They are segregated, but still permitted to attend. Why the five to ten-year olds? They were in school, but before puberty hit, when they would be considered real men. 

To some of us, this might sound absurd. People are people! How are men supposed to change without women around to show them the way? My eleven-year/fourteen-year/seventeen-year old son is not a man yet. But, I promise, to these women, Separatism was a grave and intensely crucial topic that required an opinion, one way or the other; black or white – choose or you were dismissed (physically and emotionally). Gray simply did not exist. Whole groups (and clubs) revolved around defining the word “Separatism” and who “qualified” as a real Separatist. In a fantastic article in the New Yorker, Ariel Levy says: 

“Different groups had different definitions of separatism, ranging from a refusal to associate with men to a refusal to associate with straight women to a refusal to associate with gay women who weren’t separatists.” 

The most idealistic/dogmatic womyn transformed their lives into a world where they rarely, if ever, had any contact with men. Some moved to womyn-owned land, allowing only womyn to live or visit there, excluding even male-born children; meaning mothers were required to divorce themselves from their sons. 

Does any of this sound familiar? 

Looking around, can we see parallels in the birth community? Groups form and morph depending on the cause célèbre. Should fathers be present at births? (Interestingly, while this was a big issue in the seventies and eighties, it’s come around again with Dr. Michel Odent’s belief that men should not be at births after all.) Which childbirth classes should women take? Bradley? Lamaze? None? Of course, the gulf widens as we add in Natural Birth, Normal Birth, Cesarean Birth and Unassisted Births. 

We also see this in the politics of birth even as I speak. Whether it is women who schedule a cesarean, get an early epidural or have an Unassisted (child)Birth (UC), proponents and detractors tend to be rabid about their choices. It’s very hard to find some gray. Sometimes I wonder if it even exists. 

John MacAdams of the Marquette Warrior, says “It’s a chronic problem in the rarefied world of political correctness -- and that world has spread out of academia into the mainstream media. Members of designated victim groups are allowed to be offended at the barest slight, but feel perfectly free to express rank bigotry toward those who disagree with them, or even merely adopt a different lifestyle.” 

We see any discussion deteriorate, almost as they begin, into accusations, hurt feelings and an absolute insistence on the rightness of the speaker. Isn’t there something, anything, we have in common? How do we find it amongst the sludge we all seem to be slogging in?

 Occasionally, the thought rises to the top, “What is this doing to benefit women?” On-lookers turn their heads back and forth as if they were at a tennis match; but where’s the ball? Is all this in-fighting hurting our causes (if you will)? Or is this the normal push and pull of a larger entity, clamoring to break off and live on its own. 

The latter stages of (the larger) Separatism movement found the lesbians raging against the heterosexual women, each “side” having ghastly epithets to heave at each other. “Breeder” came from that time. 

Jill Johnston says, in “Lesbian Nation,”: (emphasis mine) 

“Women wanted to remove their support from men, the ‘enemy’ in a movement for reform, power, and self-determination. A revolutionary prototype existed in their midst. But the prejudice against women within the ranks of women, much less loving women at the intimate level, was so great (still is, of course) that feminists could only act against their own best interests and trash the women who modeled their beliefs. The split between straight feminists and lesbian feminists was extremely damaging, and will no doubt continue to be in any future wave, to the cause of women’s liberation. The internal damage within the lesbian feminist ranks was also lethal.” 

I worry the same thing will happen in birth. Will the in-fighting be so intense we will only appeal to the most radical of those interested? Will women who are simply curious be so disgusted with our polarized beliefs, they couldn’t care less if we had the answer to the riddles of the Universe because it’s impossible to hear over the roar of anger? 

In those rap group days, I worked on the San Diego Lesbian Press, the local magazine/newspaper, obviously geared towards dykes who live here in San Diego. Working on SDLP was my first experience 1. working with only women and 2. using consensus to problem solve. Working with women is a whole blog post on its own. (Sarah should write it; she has extremely strong feelings about it.) But, can I tell you now how much I HATE consensus?! I mean, seriously. Could there be anything more time-consuming and more manipulative than trying to come to a consensus? Blech. I will no longer participate in groups that use consensus as their method for problem solving. (And I know others love consensus, think it’s the only way to come to “fair” answers, but that is not the way I see it. At. All.) 

I was ignorant then, a joiner and a newly self-discovered writer, so I became a part of the SDLP Collective

The defining moment came when there was a discussion about accepting an ad from a company owned by a man. There wouldn’t be any man in the ad, no penis would subliminally peek through, but this discussion turned into a humongous, weeks-long “discussion” (and I use the term loosely). You see, SDLP needed money something fierce; could they/we afford to turn away money… even though it did come from a man? The separatist side vociferously refused to even consider accepting money from The Enemy; the ad was absolutely not to be in the paper. Just as emphatically, less rigid, though still feminist, women could see the benefit of taking the money. Wouldn’t it be using a man’s money for a good cause? Wouldn’t we be bettering our women’s lives by being able to put out a paper? (Something we very likely would not be able to do otherwise.) When using consensus, everyone has to agree, no dissenters at all. I remember occasionally making a comment, but it was obvious I was a neophyte and no one cared what I said. I was probably asking basic questions like, “What are we fighting about again? I can’t even remember anymore!” 

I ended up leaving the SDLP to fight themselves to death; and they did, too. SDLP died shortly thereafter. I snarkily say dogma killed them. 

Is this our fate as well? Are the two extremes going to kill themselves off, leaving nothing but the center? 

Thinking about myself personally, I participate in this Us vs. Them as much as the next gal… maybe more sometimes. I’ve been implored to keep my mouth shut about certain issues, to try and make peace with all the birth sisters around me, no matter how much I disagree. But, you see, I wasn’t mature enough to ask the right questions back in early 1990. However, today, with many years of birth work under my belt, I feel qualified to defend my position and to speak, if not somewhat eloquently, at least pretty darn clearly about what I see and why. I’m an old crone of a midwife now (even though my midwife years are nothing compared to many of my peers), sharing the stories of those around me. Most are gloriously beautiful, wondrous births. But, too many of the stories aren’t fabulously perfect births; they have ended in tragedy and pain. I tell those stories, too. If it angers some women, then so be it. Their stories piss me off, too, so I guess, in some alternate-universe way, we’re even. 

When I stand back and see the parallels between the two Separatist movements, I know they are but two of a billion other arguments/discussions/opinions going on simultaneously. From husband vs. wife, Catholic vs. Protestant and the United States vs. everyone else to Wall Street vs. stockholders, Unions vs. employers and organic vs. commercially grown food… thinking there are just two sides is absurd. The same way couples go to therapy, employers go to mediation and we get to choose our food by which ones we buy, there have to be other ways of bridging the gaps we have in birth besides blowing each other up with bombs. 

I think about the song “From a Distance” that Bette Midler sings. 

“From a distance you look like my friend,
even though we are at war.
From a distance I just cannot comprehend
what all this fighting is for.

From a distance there is harmony,
and it echoes through the land.
And it's the hope of hopes, it's the love of loves,
it's the heart of every man.” 

I promise to remind myself, in the heat of those moments when I am standing toe to toe with another woman, that even as I speak my mind and tell my stories, I will remember she is a sister, she does have valuable things to say and I will keep an open heart and mind to what she is saying. I would only wish the same from her.

 

Me (and my big butt) marching in the LGBT Parade in the early 90's. Look! Polarized views even about marching with kids!

 

Saturday
Jun262010

Kent's Gay, Already

We interrupt this midwifery blog for a moment to discuss a socio-political issue unfolding on the Fox television network. 

This is only the third season I’ve seen So You Think You Can Dance, yet the show has easily become one of my favorites. SYTYCD is filmed in Los Angeles, but travels the country looking for dancers to participate in the contest. Each week, they learn new dances in a variety of dance styles and then the public phones in to vote for their favorite. The next night, after the voting, the bottom three “dance for their lives,” performing in their own genre and the judges make the final decision who goes home and who stays. 

You can’t be in the entertainment industry and not know a great many gay men and lesbian women. Lots of the handsome hunk movie stars are homosexuals, but it’s unlikely we’ll ever hear about it until after their deaths in some old lover’s tell-all. Being gay goes in and out of style; many shows right now have a token gay character. There are certainly periods of time when you can’t find someone gay on any of the hundreds of channels. (Except for Logo, of course!) 

It would still be illegal to have homosexual sex in many states if it weren’t for the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas case that made prosecuting for sodomy illegal. Public opinion all too often lags far behind the court rulings, so homophobia remains rampant in the United States. 

But, we’re in California, where gay marriage was legal for half a second. Wouldn’t we think this part of the country might have a wider mental expanse? Apparently, not so. SYTYCD has had many gay dancers (as you’d expect). But, what is odd is the show turns a blind eye towards any homosexual inclinations. The men are groomed to be sensuous partners for sexy females… many, many of the dances involving courtship or, in plenty of cases, out and out erotic insinuations. I understand that most of the world is heterosexual, but it’s gotten to be the elephant in the room, this pretending the men aren’t gay thing. 

The worst case of this is the incredible charade is with this season’s Kent Boyd, an 18-year old from Botkins, Ohio. From his first presentation on the season opener, Kent has been being pushed towards a heterosexual fascade. Those of us watching almost fell over when host Cat Deeley asked Kent who was his perfect woman. Stunned, he croaked, “My mom?” She pressed on, “Or who?” and he obligingly answered, “Beyonce!” How much gayer can you get? 

Glad that clumsy interaction was over, it didn’t seem possible they would keep trying to het him up, but between Cat and Nigel Lithgow (the producer), Kent can’t catch a lifestyle break. 

When Kent comes out to dance with each of the vixens, comments abound about his prowess with the women or how the women will certainly be taken by him. That might be fine and dandy for voting, but is this all okay with young Kent? Is he even out of the closet yet? Is he part of this “please help keep me under the gaydar” ploy? 

What would be so wrong with letting the queers be dancing fairies? Would they get fewer votes from the drooling young female fans that seem to make calls for naked male chests? 

For those of us who live the Gay Life, the prospect of everyone being out when they are, even on tv, seems delicious. I pray they stop trying to cram sweet Kent into a mold that isn’t remotely his style.